Skip to content

Relative homology and exact sequences

Hatcher §2.1 (pages 110, 113–124, and 127–128). The selected slices introduce reduced homology from the augmented singular complex, relative homology of a topological pair, pair and triple long exact sequences, homotopy invariance, and naturality. A fourth milestone continues through small chains and excision and is decomposed into ten formalizable leaves, all complete. A fifth, fifteen-leaf milestone covers good pairs, Proposition 2.22, Theorem 2.13, and the quotient sequence's naturality; all fifteen leaves are formalized locally and complete.

The mathematical source is Hatcher. The representation against Mathlib is fixed separately in the project-authored implementation specification. The four-node reduced-homology branch and the generic algebraic exact-sequence node are complete. The SSetPair relative-homology foundation is also complete because the current Mathlib v4.34.1 pin contains PR #41285, and the singular-pair functor is formalized locally. Relative singular homology is also formalized, as is the pair long exact sequence, including its connecting-map formula and naturality. The compatible relative chain homotopy and induced homology-map equality complete the relative homotopy branch and Proposition 2.19. The reduced pair sequence, its naturality, and the pointed comparison are also formalized. Thus all fifteen leaves in the reduced- and relative-pair slice are complete. All four leaves in the triple-sequence slice are formalized locally as well.

Formalization progress
10 definitions · 9 results
2 in mathlib17 fully proved

Reduced homology

Definition64The augmented singular chain complex#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 110). For a space X and coefficient object R, augment the singular chain complex by the map from degree-zero chains to R that sends every singular zero-simplex to the identity of R.

The main artifact should be Hatcher.Reduced.augmentedSingularChainComplexFunctor. Mathlib's ChainComplex.augment shifts the ordinary singular complex up one degree, so degree zero is R and degree n + 1 is Cₙ(X;R). Supporting declarations construct the natural chain-level augmentation and prove that the degree-one boundary followed by it is zero.

The construction is coefficient-general in an abelian category with the required coproducts. Hatcher's complex is its integral specialization. The functor may be defined for the empty space as well; the roadmap's nonnegative-degree groups then extend Hatcher's convention, which suppresses the degree -1 group by working with nonempty spaces.

Dependencies
Definition65Reduced singular homology#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (pages 110 and 113). Define reduced singular homology Ḥₙ(X;R) as degree n + 1 homology of the augmented singular chain complex. Continuous maps induce maps on these groups, giving a functor in the space.

The main artifact should be Hatcher.Reduced.homologyFunctor. It must use the augmented complex rather than define reduced homology through a chosen basepoint; the latter is a theorem in Example 2.18. Defining the functor on the empty space is harmless in the displayed nonnegative degrees and is recorded as an extension of Hatcher's nonempty-space convention.

Dependencies
Definition71Reduced and ordinary homology agree in positive degrees#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 110). For every space X, coefficient object R, and positive degree n, construct the natural isomorphism Ḥₙ(X;R) ≅ Hₙ(X;R).

The main artifact should be Hatcher.Reduced.homologyIsoOfPositiveDegree. It is induced by the degree shift in ChainComplex.augment, not by choosing a basepoint.

Dependencies
Definition72Zeroth homology splits into reduced homology and the coefficient object#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 110). For a space X with a chosen point and coefficient object R, split the augmentation to obtain H₀(X;R) ≅ H̃₀(X;R) ⊞ R.

The main artifact should be Hatcher.Reduced.homologyZeroIso. The chosen point supplies a section of the augmentation. The result is deliberately not claimed to be natural for unpointed spaces.

Dependencies

Relative chains and homology

Definition58Relative homology of a simplicial-set pair#✓in mathlib

For a monomorphism A ⟶ X of simplicial sets, form the cokernel chain complex Cₙ(X;R) / Cₙ(A;R), its homology functor, the quotient map from absolute chains, and the connecting morphisms and exactness results relating the homology of A, X, and (X,A).

At the current Mathlib v4.34.1 pin, the main artifact is the upstream definition SSetPair.homologyFunctor in Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/SimplicialSet/Homology/Relative.lean; its supporting API includes SSetPair.chainComplex, homologyπ, homologyδ, and homology_exact₁/₂/₃.

Mathlib v4.34.1 contains PR #41285, so this foundational node is complete. The singular-pair functor is now formalized, and relative singular homology is formalized on top of it.

Dependencies
Definition59The singular set of a topological pair#✓fully proved

For a topological pair P, apply TopCat.toSSet to the embedding P.map : P.snd ⟶ P.fst and prove the resulting simplicial map is a monomorphism. This defines a functor from topological pairs to simplicial-set pairs while preserving maps of pairs.

Formalized as Hatcher.Relative.singularPairFunctor : TopPair ⥤ SSetPair in Hatcher/Singular/Relative.lean. The direction respects the two APIs: TopPair.fst is the ambient space and SSetPair.right is the ambient simplicial set. Joël Riou's excision prototype contains a compatible TopPair.toSSetPair, but it is implementation prior art, not a pinned dependency.

Dependencies
Definition62Relative singular chains and homology#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (pages 115–118). For a topological pair (X,A), define relative singular chains as Cₙ(X;R) / Cₙ(A;R) and relative singular homology as their homology. A map of pairs induces the corresponding map on relative chains and homology.

Formalized as Hatcher.Relative.homologyFunctor, with Hatcher.Relative.chainComplexFunctor for relative chains and Hatcher.Relative.chainComplexFunctorπ for the natural quotient from ambient singular chains. These definitions compose the topological singular-pair functor with Mathlib's SSetPair functors, whose cokernel construction supplies the categorical quotient behavior. The elementwise description of the connecting map is recorded with the integral long exact sequence rather than imposed on arbitrary coefficient categories.

Dependencies

Exact sequences and homotopy invariance

Theorem52A short exact sequence gives an exact homology sequence#✓in mathlib

Hatcher, Theorem 2.16 (pages 116–117). A short exact sequence of chain complexes in an abelian category induces an exact long sequence in homology, with connecting maps lowering degree by one.

The pinned theorem HomologicalComplex.HomologySequence.composableArrows₅_exact proves the exactness of every consecutive six-object segment. Together with its degree parameters, these segments are Hatcher's long exact sequence. The connecting morphism and the three local exactness statements are supplied by CategoryTheory.ShortComplex.ShortExact.δ and homology_exact₁/₂/₃ in the same API.

For a complex indexed by ℕ, the six-object theorem does not itself express the terminal epimorphism into degree-zero homology. The pinned supporting lemma HomologicalComplex.epi_homologyMap_of_epi_of_not_rel supplies that endpoint when there is no lower degree; the pair-specific API exposes the corresponding Epi instance for its degree-zero relative-chain projection.

Dependencies
Theorem53The long exact sequence of a pair#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 117). For a topological pair (X,A), the inclusion, the map induced by the relative-chain quotient, and the connecting maps form an exact sequence

... → Hₙ(A;R) → Hₙ(X;R) → Hₙ(X,A;R) → Hₙ₋₁(A;R) → ....

Hatcher.Relative.pairSequence packages six consecutive terms, while Hatcher.Relative.pairSequence_exact proves exactness at every position, uniformly over adjacent degrees. Hatcher.Relative.pairConnecting exposes the connecting morphism, and Hatcher.Relative.pairConnecting_eq proves that it sends a relative cycle represented by α to the homology class of ∂α. In the integral AddCommGrpCat specialization, generalized elements from ℤ recover the source's elementwise formula δ[α] = [∂α].

Dependencies
Theorem64The pair long exact sequence is natural#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 127). A map of topological pairs induces a morphism between their long exact homology sequences. In particular it commutes with the inclusion maps, the maps induced by the relative-chain quotients, and the connecting homomorphisms.

Hatcher.Relative.pairSequenceMap packages the induced morphism between six consecutive terms. Naturality of the ordinary and relative homology functors supplies its inclusion and quotient squares, while Hatcher.Relative.pairConnecting_naturality proves the substantive square containing the connecting morphism.

Dependencies
Definition84A homotopy of pairs gives a relative chain homotopy#✓fully proved

For homotopic maps of topological pairs, descend the compatible singular-chain homotopies on the ambient spaces and subspaces through the relative-chain cokernels. The result is a chain homotopy between the induced maps on relative singular chain complexes.

Hatcher.Relative.chainHomotopyOfPairHomotopy carries this out degreewise by the cokernel universal property. It first proves that the ambient and subspace singular-chain homotopies commute with the inclusions, then descends the ambient homotopy to the relative quotient. This compatibility is essential: an unrelated pair of absolute chain homotopies does not define a map on the quotient complex.

Dependencies
Theorem71Homotopic maps of pairs induce the same relative-homology map#✓fully proved

Hatcher, Proposition 2.19 (page 118). If two maps f,g : (X,A) ⟶ (Y,B) are homotopic through maps of pairs, then they induce the same map Hₙ(X,A;R) ⟶ Hₙ(Y,B;R) in every degree.

Hatcher.Relative.congr_homologyMap applies chain-homotopy invariance to the compatible relative chain homotopy constructed by Hatcher.Relative.chainHomotopyOfPairHomotopy. The proof therefore descends the explicit ambient and subspace homotopies to relative chains before passing to homology; it does not treat the HomologyPretheory.IsHomotopyInvariant interface as a proof of the result.

Dependencies
Theorem54The reduced long exact sequence of a nonempty pair#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 118). For a topological pair (X,A) with nonempty subspace, replace the two absolute homology terms in the pair long exact sequence by reduced homology while retaining the same relative groups. The resulting sequence is exact in every degree.

Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairSequence packages six consecutive terms and Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairSequence_exact proves their exactness. The construction uses the short exact sequence of augmented subspace and ambient chains together with the zero-augmented relative complex. For a chosen point of the nonempty subspace, Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairZeroSequence_exact also proves the terminal exact sequence H̃₀(A) → H̃₀(X) → H₀(X,A) → 0 directly from the augmentation. The overlap lemmas identify these finite windows as one coherent sequence, and Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairLongExact packages all exactness conclusions.

Dependencies
Theorem65The reduced pair long exact sequence is natural#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (pages 127–128). A map of topological pairs with nonempty subspaces induces a morphism between their reduced long exact homology sequences, commuting in particular with the connecting homomorphisms.

Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairSequenceMap packages the induced morphism between six consecutive terms. The main theorem Hatcher.Relative.reducedPairConnecting_naturality proves the connecting square directly from the natural augmented-chain construction, including in degree zero. It does not transport naturality through a chosen-point splitting of zeroth homology, since that splitting is not natural for unpointed spaces.

Dependencies
Definition74Relative homology at a basepoint is reduced homology#✓fully proved

Hatcher, Example 2.18 (page 118). For a space X with chosen point x₀, construct an isomorphism Hₙ(X,{x₀};R) ≅ H̃ₙ(X;R) for every degree n.

Hatcher.Relative.pointedPairHomologyIso constructs this comparison from the reduced long exact sequence and the vanishing of reduced homology of a point. It includes degree zero rather than only the positive-degree case.

Dependencies

Triple exact sequence

Structure3Topological triples and their maps#✓fully proved

For nested subspaces B ⊆ A ⊆ X, bundle the composable embeddings B ↪ A ↪ X as a topological triple (X,A,B). It determines the three topological pairs (A,B), (X,B), and (X,A), together with the canonical maps of pairs

(A,B) → (X,B) → (X,A).

Define a morphism of triples by compatible maps on all three spaces, and expose the induced morphisms of these pairs. The main declaration is Hatcher.Relative.TopTriple; its morphism and pair projections are supporting definitions in the same review unit.

Dependencies
Theorem68Relative chains of a triple form a short exact sequence#✓fully proved

For a topological triple (X,A,B) and coefficients R, the canonical maps of relative singular chain complexes form a short exact sequence

0 → C_*(A,B;R) → C_*(X,B;R) → C_*(X,A;R) → 0.

The main theorem Hatcher.Relative.tripleChainComplexShortComplex_shortExact proves short exactness. The short complex itself and its functorial maps are supporting declarations. Its proof uses the cokernel tail of Mathlib's kernelCokernelCompSequence and the existing universal properties of relative chains, rather than copying the unmerged basis-splitting implementation from Mathlib PR #41318.

Dependencies
Theorem69The long exact sequence of a triple#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (pages 118–119). For nested subspaces B ⊆ A ⊆ X, the relative groups fit into a long exact sequence

⋯ → H_n(A,B;R) → H_n(X,B;R) → H_n(X,A;R) → H_{n-1}(A,B;R) → H_{n-1}(X,B;R) → ⋯.

For adjacent degrees m + 1 = n, Hatcher.Relative.tripleSequence packages six consecutive terms and Hatcher.Relative.tripleSequence_exact proves exactness at every position. The same review unit exposes the connecting map and Hatcher.Relative.tripleHomologyMapXBToXA_zero_epi proves the degree-zero epimorphism H_0(X,B;R) → H_0(X,A;R).

Dependencies
Theorem118The triple long exact sequence is natural#✓fully proved

Hatcher, §2.1 (page 128). A map of triples induces a morphism between their long exact homology sequences. The maps on the three relative terms commute with the inclusion, quotient, and connecting morphisms.

Hatcher.Relative.tripleSequenceMap packages the induced morphism between six consecutive terms. The main theorem Hatcher.Relative.tripleConnecting_naturality proves the substantive square containing the connecting morphism; the remaining squares follow from functoriality of relative homology.

Dependencies

Small chains and excision

Good pairs and quotient exact sequences

Post-excision applications

Decomposed and deferred boundary

Theorem 2.20 and its Proposition 2.21 small-chain machinery are decomposed in the milestone above, and all ten leaves are complete. Theorem 2.13, Proposition 2.22, and their naturality are formalized locally and complete in the good-pair milestone. The arbitrary-pair mapping-cone comparison, Example 2.23, Corollaries 2.24–2.25, and invariance of dimension are formalized and complete in the post-excision milestone. Example 2.17 and the simplicial–singular comparison remain deferred.

Sources