Covering and inductive dimension

DefinitionCovering dimension at most n#✓fully proved

A topological space \(X\) has covering dimension at most \(n \in \mathbb{N}\) if every finite open cover \(U_1, \dots, U_m\) of \(X\) has a finite open refinement \(V_1, \dots, V_k\) (open sets covering \(X\), each contained in some \(U_i\)) in which any \(n + 2\) members with distinct indices have empty intersection, that is, the refinement has order at most \(n + 1\).

def CoverLE (n : ℕ) (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop :=
  ∀ (m : ℕ) (U : Fin m → Set X),
    (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (⋃ i, U i) = Set.univ →
    ∃ (k : ℕ) (V : Fin k → Set X),
      (∀ j, IsOpen (V j)) ∧ (⋃ j, V j) = Set.univ ∧
      (∀ j, ∃ i, V j ⊆ U i) ∧
      ∀ s : Finset (Fin k), s.card = n + 2 →
        (⋂ j ∈ s, V j) = ∅
Used by 1

TheoremSmall inductive and covering dimension can differ for compact Hausdorff spaces#●ready to prove

Scottish Book Problem 187, part (2), has a negative answer: it is not the case that for every compact Hausdorff space \(X\) and every \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), \(X\) has small inductive dimension at most \(n\) if and only if \(X\) has covering dimension at most \(n\).

The small inductive dimension is used here; Alexandroff's typescript does not say whether small or large inductive dimension is meant. The Lunts–Lokutsievskii example is a compact Hausdorff space \(X\) whose covering dimension \(\dim X\) differs from its small inductive dimension \(\operatorname{ind} X\) (Encyclopedia of Mathematics, "Dimension theory"; R. Engelking, Dimension Theory, North-Holland, 1978).

theorem_wanted scottishBook187b_refuted :
    ¬ ∀ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [T2Space X] [CompactSpace X],
      ∀ n : ℕ, HasSmallInductiveDimensionLE X n ↔ CoverLE n X
Sources
  • P. Alexandroff, Problem 187 part (2) of the Scottish Book, typescript pp. 82–83.
Uses 1
1 fully proved1 ready to prove

The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.

Download the complete graph data.