Lower bounds for AC0 circuits

TheoremMajority is not in AC0#●ready to prove

The majority language is not in the class \(\mathsf{AC}^0\).

public theorem_wanted majority_not_in_ac0 :
    majorityDec ∉ AC0
Sources
  • M. Ajtai, "Σ₁¹-formulae on finite structures", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 24 (1983), 1-48; J. Håstad, "Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits" (STOC 1986).
Uses 4

TheoremParity is not in AC0#●ready to prove

The parity language, which accepts a bitstring exactly when an odd number of its entries are true, is not in the class \(\mathsf{AC}^0\).

public theorem_wanted parity_not_in_ac0 :
    parityDec ∉ AC0
Sources
  • M. Furst, J. Saxe, and M. Sipser, "Parity, circuits, and the polynomial-time hierarchy", Mathematical Systems Theory 17 (1984), 13-27; M. Ajtai, "Σ₁¹-formulae on finite structures", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 24 (1983), 1-48; J. Håstad, "Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits", Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1986), 6-20.
Uses 4
2 ready to prove

The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.

Download the complete graph data.