Regular partitions and a generalized tau function

TheoremEuler's product has constant term \(1\)#✓fully proved

The constant coefficient of the integer power series \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - X^m)\) in \(\mathbb{Z}[[X]]\) is \(1\).

public theorem constantCoeff_pentagonalSeries_int :
    constantCoeff (pentagonalSeries ℤ) = 1
Sources
  • Euler's pentagonal number theorem as used in Sriram and Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, identity (1).
Used by 2

TheoremEuler's product is a unit in \(\mathbb{Z}((X))\)#✓fully proved

Euler's pentagonal series \(\sum_{k \in \mathbb{Z}} (-1)^k X^{k(3k - 1)/2}\), which equals \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - X^m)\), is a unit of the ring \(\mathbb{Z}[[X]]\) of formal power series with integer coefficients, so all its integer powers are defined.

public theorem isUnit_pentagonalSeries_int : IsUnit (pentagonalSeries ℤ)
Sources
  • Sriram and Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Definition 1.1 (negative exponents).
Uses 1 · Used by 4

DefinitionGeneralized tau function#✓fully proved

For an integer \(k\) and a natural number \(n\), the generalized tau function \(\tau_k(n)\) is the coefficient of \(q^n\) in the integer power series \(q \prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)^k\). For negative \(k\) the power is taken in the group of units of \(\mathbb{Z}[[q]]\), where \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)\) is invertible because its constant term is \(1\).

The paper requires \(k \ne 0\); \(k = 0\) gives \(\tau_0(1) = 1\) and \(\tau_0(n) = 0\) for \(n \ne 1\). \(\tau_{24}\) is Ramanujan's tau function, and \(\tau_1(n + 1)\) is Euler's \(\omega(n)\), the coefficient of \(q^n\) in \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)\).

public noncomputable def generalizedTau (k : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : ℤ :=
  coeff n (X * ((isUnit_pentagonalSeries_int.unit ^ k : ℤ⟦X⟧ˣ) : ℤ⟦X⟧))
Sources
  • Sriram and Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Definition 1.1, equation (2).
Uses 1 · Used by 29
Used byPrime-regular partitions and the generalized tau function · \(2^s\)-regular partitions and the generalized tau function modulo 2 · Parity of \(\tau_{14}\) and \(\tau_6\) at odd arguments · Vanishing of the generalized tau function modulo \(|k|/d\) · Vanishing of \(\tau_k(n)\) modulo the prime \(k - 1\) · The generalized tau function for natural exponents · \(\tau_{-k}\) and partition convolutions modulo a prime · The generalized tau function at \(1\) · Generalized tau at a prime power modulo the prime · Generalized tau at \(p^2 + 1\) modulo \(p\) · Partition formulas for the generalized tau function · Parity of the generalized tau function via part frequencies · Generalized tau at \(2p + 1\) modulo \(p\) · Generalized tau function \(\tau_{2p}\) modulo \(p\) · \(\tau_{2p}(n + 1)\) vanishes modulo \(p\) when \(p \nmid n\) · Generalized tau function at zero · Divisibility of \(n\,\tau_k(n + 1)\) by \(|k|\) · Ramanujan's tau function modulo divisors of \(24\) · Ramanujan's congruence modulo \(7\) · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(25\) via \(5\)-regular partitions · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(3\) via \(9\)-regular partitions · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(11\) via pentagonal numbers · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(23\) via pentagonal numbers · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(13\) via \(\tau_{11}\) · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(17\) via \(\tau_7\) · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(19\) via \(\tau_5\) · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(7\) via triangular numbers · Ramanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(5\) via \(25\)-regular partitions · Ramanujan's congruence \(\tau(3n) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\)

TheoremGeneralized tau function at zero#✓fully proved

For every integer \(k\), \(\tau_k(0) = 0\), where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function: the series \(q \prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)^k\) has no constant term.

public theorem generalizedTau_zero (k : ℤ) : generalizedTau k 0 = 0
Sources
  • Sriram and Christopher, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Definition 1.1.
Uses 2

TheoremThe generalized tau function at \(1\)#✓fully proved

For every integer \(k\), \(\tau_k(1) = 1\).

public theorem generalizedTau_one (k : ℤ) : generalizedTau k 1 = 1
Sources
  • Sriram and Christopher, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Definition 1.1.
Uses 3

TheoremThe generalized tau function for natural exponents#✓fully proved

For natural numbers \(k\) and \(n\), \(\tau_k(n)\) is the coefficient of \(q^n\) in the integer power series \(q \bigl(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)\bigr)^k\).

public theorem generalizedTau_natCast (k n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau k n = coeff n (X * pentagonalSeries ℤ ^ k)
Sources
  • Sriram and Christopher, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Definition 1.1.
Uses 2

TheoremPartition formulas for the generalized tau function#●ready to prove

Let \(k \ge 1\) and \(n \ge 0\) be natural numbers. For a partition \(\lambda\) of \(n\) and a part \(a\) of \(\lambda\), write \(f_a\) for the number of times \(a\) occurs in \(\lambda\). Then

\[\tau_k(n + 1) = \sum_{\lambda} \prod_{a} (-1)^{f_a} \binom{k}{f_a},\]

where \(\lambda\) runs over the partitions of \(n\) with \(f_a \le k\) for every part \(a\) and the product runs over the distinct parts \(a\) of \(\lambda\), and

\[\tau_{-k}(n + 1) = \sum_{\lambda} \prod_{a} \binom{f_a + k - 1}{k - 1},\]

where \(\lambda\) runs over all partitions of \(n\) and the product again runs over the distinct parts \(a\) of \(\lambda\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_succ_eq_partition_sum (k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) (n : ℕ) :
    (generalizedTau k (n + 1) =
        ∑ p ∈ Finset.univ.filter
            (fun p : Nat.Partition n => ∀ a ∈ p.parts, p.parts.count a ≤ k),
          ∏ a ∈ p.parts.toFinset,
            (-1 : ℤ) ^ p.parts.count a * (k.choose (p.parts.count a) : ℤ)) ∧
      (generalizedTau (-(k : ℤ)) (n + 1) =
        ∑ p : Nat.Partition n,
          ∏ a ∈ p.parts.toFinset, ((p.parts.count a + k - 1).choose (k - 1) : ℤ))
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 1.
Uses 1

TheoremParity of the generalized tau function via part frequencies#●ready to prove

Let \(k \ge 1\) and \(n \ge 0\) be natural numbers, and let \(A\) be the set of integers \(a\) with \(1 \le a \le k\) and \(\binom{k}{a}\) odd. Then \(\tau_k(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(2\) to the number of partitions of \(n\) in which the number of times each part occurs lies in \(A\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_succ_modEq_card_frequency_two (k : ℕ) (hk : 0 < k) (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau k (n + 1) ≡
      ((Finset.univ.filter fun p : Nat.Partition n =>
        ∀ i ∈ p.parts,
          p.parts.count i ∈ (Finset.Icc 1 k).filter (fun a => Odd (k.choose a))).card : ℤ)
      [ZMOD 2]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 2.
Uses 1

TheoremParity of the \(4\)-regular partition function#●ready to prove

For a positive integer \(n\), let \(R_4(n)\) be the number of partitions of \(n\) with no part divisible by \(4\). Then \(R_4(n)\) is odd if and only if \(n\) is a triangular number, that is, \(n = m(m + 1)/2\) for some integer \(m \ge 0\).

public theorem_wanted odd_card_four_regular_iff_triangular (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    Odd (Nat.Partition.restricted n (¬ 4 ∣ ·)).card ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, n = m * (m + 1) / 2
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 3.

TheoremParity of \(\tau_{14}\) and \(\tau_6\) at odd arguments#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau_k(m)\) be the generalized tau function, the coefficient of \(q^m\) in \(q \prod_{j \ge 1} (1 - q^j)^k\), and let \(R_8(n)\) be the number of partitions of \(n\) in which no part is divisible by \(8\). For every positive integer \(n\): (a) \(\tau_{14}(2n + 1) \equiv R_8(n) \pmod 2\); (b) \(\tau_6(2n + 1)\) is odd if and only if \(n\) is a triangular number, that is, \(n = m(m + 1)/2\) for some natural number \(m\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_fourteen_six_odd_index_mod_two (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 14 (2 * n + 1) ≡ ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 8 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) [ZMOD 2] ∧
      (Odd (generalizedTau 6 (2 * n + 1)) ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, n = m * (m + 1) / 2)
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 4.
Uses 1

Theorem\(2^s\)-regular partitions and the generalized tau function modulo 2#●ready to prove

Let \(s\) be a positive integer and \(n\) a natural number. Let \(R_{2^s}(n)\) be the number of partitions of \(n\) in which no part is divisible by \(2^s\), and let \(\tau_k(m)\) be the generalized tau function, the coefficient of \(q^m\) in \(q \prod_{j \ge 1} (1 - q^j)^k\). Then \(R_{2^s}(n) \equiv \tau_{2^s - 1}(n + 1) \pmod 2\).

public theorem_wanted card_two_pow_regular_modEq_generalizedTau (s : ℕ) (hs : 0 < s) (n : ℕ) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 2 ^ s ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
        ≡ generalizedTau ((2 : ℤ) ^ s - 1) (n + 1) [ZMOD 2]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 5.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(3\) via \(9\)-regular partitions#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(R_9(m)\) be the number of partitions of \(m\) with no part divisible by \(9\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(n + 1) \equiv R_9(n/3) \pmod 3\) if \(3\) divides \(n\), and \(\tau(n + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\) otherwise.

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_nine_regular (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      (if 3 ∣ n then ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n / 3) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) else 0) [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 6.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's congruence \(\tau(3n) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function. For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(3n) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_three_mul_modEq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (3 * n) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 1.
Uses 1

Theorem9-regular partitions modulo 3 and the divisor sum#●ready to prove

Let \(R_9(m)\) denote the number of partitions of \(m\) in which no part is divisible by \(9\), and let \(\sigma(m)\) be the sum of the positive divisors of \(m\). For every positive integer \(n\), \(R_9(n) \equiv \sigma(3n + 1) \pmod 3\).

public theorem_wanted card_nine_regular_modEq_sigma (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
        ≡ (ArithmeticFunction.sigma 1 (3 * n + 1) : ℤ) [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 2.

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(5\) via \(25\)-regular partitions#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(R_{25}(n)\) be the number of partitions of \(n\) with no part divisible by \(25\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(n + 1) \equiv R_{25}(n) \pmod 5\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_twentyfive_regular (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡ ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 25 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) [ZMOD 5]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 7.
Uses 1

Theorem25-regular partitions modulo 5 and the divisor sum#●ready to prove

Let \(R_{25}(m)\) denote the number of partitions of \(m\) in which no part is divisible by \(25\), and let \(\sigma(m)\) be the sum of the positive divisors of \(m\). For every positive integer \(n\), \(R_{25}(n) \equiv (n + 1) \, \sigma(n + 1) \pmod 5\).

public theorem_wanted card_twentyfive_regular_modEq_mul_sigma (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 25 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) ≡ ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ)
        * (ArithmeticFunction.sigma 1 (n + 1) : ℤ) [ZMOD 5]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 3.

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(7\) via triangular numbers#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function. For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(7\) to the sum of \((-1)^{m + r} (2m + 1)(2r + 1)\) over all pairs of integers \(m, r \ge 0\) with \(m(m + 1)/2 + 7r(r + 1)/2 = n\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_triangular_sum_seven (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ m ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ∑ r ∈ Finset.range (n + 1),
        if m * (m + 1) / 2 + 7 * (r * (r + 1) / 2) = n then
          (-1 : ℤ) ^ (m + r) * ((2 * m + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) * ((2 * r + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ)
        else 0 [ZMOD 7]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 8.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(11\) via pentagonal numbers#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) for integers \(r\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(11\) to the sum of \((-1)^{l + m + s + r}\) over all quadruples of integers \((l, m, s, r)\) with \(P(l) + P(m) + 11P(s) + 11P(r) = n\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_pentagonal_sum_eleven (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ l ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ m ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ s ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
          ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if pentagonal l + pentagonal m + 11 * pentagonal s + 11 * pentagonal r = n then
          ((l + m + s + r).negOnePow : ℤ)
        else 0 [ZMOD 11]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 9.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(13\) via \(\tau_{11}\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) for integers \(r\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\),

\[\tau(n + 1) \equiv \sum_{13P(r) \le n} (-1)^r \tau_{11}(n - 13P(r) + 1) \pmod{13},\]

the sum running over all integers \(r\) with \(13P(r) \le n\).

The source record prints \(\tau_{11}(s)\) in place of \(\tau_{11}(s + 1)\), where \(n = 13P(r) + s\); that version is false at \(n = 1\). The shifted index comes from the identity \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)^{11} (1 - q^{13m}) = \sum_{r, s} (-1)^r \tau_{11}(s + 1) q^{13P(r) + s}\), which follows from Definition 1.1 and is used in the proof.

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_pentagonal_tau_eleven (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if 13 * pentagonal r ≤ n then
          (r.negOnePow : ℤ) * generalizedTau 11 (n - 13 * pentagonal r + 1)
        else 0 [ZMOD 13]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 10.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(17\) via \(\tau_7\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) for integers \(r\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\),

\[\tau(n + 1) \equiv \sum_{17P(r) \le n} (-1)^r \tau_7(n - 17P(r) + 1) \pmod{17},\]

the sum running over all integers \(r\) with \(17P(r) \le n\).

The source record prints \(\tau_7(s)\) in place of \(\tau_7(s + 1)\), where \(n = 17P(r) + s\); that version is false at \(n = 1\). The shifted index comes from the identity \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)^7 (1 - q^{17m}) = \sum_{r, s} (-1)^r \tau_7(s + 1) q^{17P(r) + s}\), which follows from Definition 1.1 and is used in the proof.

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_pentagonal_tau_seven (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if 17 * pentagonal r ≤ n then
          (r.negOnePow : ℤ) * generalizedTau 7 (n - 17 * pentagonal r + 1)
        else 0 [ZMOD 17]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 11.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(19\) via \(\tau_5\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) for integers \(r\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\),

\[\tau(n + 1) \equiv \sum_{19P(r) \le n} (-1)^r \tau_5(n - 19P(r) + 1) \pmod{19},\]

the sum running over all integers \(r\) with \(19P(r) \le n\).

The source record prints \(\tau_5(s)\) in place of \(\tau_5(s + 1)\), where \(n = 19P(r) + s\); that version is false at \(n = 1\). The shifted index comes from the identity \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)^5 (1 - q^{19m}) = \sum_{r, s} (-1)^r \tau_5(s + 1) q^{19P(r) + s}\), which follows from Definition 1.1 and is used in the proof.

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_pentagonal_tau_five (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if 19 * pentagonal r ≤ n then
          (r.negOnePow : ℤ) * generalizedTau 5 (n - 19 * pentagonal r + 1)
        else 0 [ZMOD 19]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 12.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(23\) via pentagonal numbers#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function, and let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) for integers \(r\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\), \(\tau(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(23\) to the sum of \((-1)^{r + s}\) over all pairs of integers \((r, s)\) with \(P(r) + 23P(s) = n\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_pentagonal_sum_twentythree (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ s ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if pentagonal r + 23 * pentagonal s = n then ((r + s).negOnePow : ℤ) else 0
      [ZMOD 23]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 13.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's \(\tau\) modulo \(25\) via \(5\)-regular partitions#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau = \tau_{24}\) be Ramanujan's tau function, where \(\tau_k\) is the generalized tau function. Let \(R_5(m)\) be the number of partitions of \(m\) with no part divisible by \(5\), and let \(P(t) = t(3t - 1)/2\) for integers \(t\). For every integer \(n \ge 1\),

\[\tau(n + 1) \equiv \sum (-1)^{s + t} (2s + 1) R_5\big(n - 5s(s + 1)/2 - 5P(t)\big) \pmod{25},\]

the sum running over all integers \(s \ge 0\) and \(t\) with \(5s(s + 1)/2 + 5P(t) \le n\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_succ_modEq_five_regular_sum_twentyfive (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ s ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ∑ t ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if 5 * (s * (s + 1) / 2) + 5 * pentagonal t ≤ n then
          (((s : ℤ) + t).negOnePow : ℤ) * ((2 * s + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) *
            ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n - 5 * (s * (s + 1) / 2) - 5 * pentagonal t)
                (¬ 5 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
        else 0 [ZMOD 25]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 14.
Uses 1

TheoremGeneralized tau at a prime power modulo the prime#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be a prime, let \(s \ge 1\) and \(n \ge 0\) be natural numbers, and for an integer \(t\) let \(P(t) = t(3t - 1)/2\) be the generalized pentagonal number. Then \(\tau_{p^s}(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(p\) to the sum of \((-1)^t\) over the integers \(t\) with \(-n \le t \le n\) and \(n = p^s P(t)\).

Since \(P\) is injective, this sum has at most one term: \(\tau_{p^s}(n + 1) \equiv (-1)^t \pmod{p}\) if \(n = p^s P(t)\), and \(\tau_{p^s}(n + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod{p}\) if \(n\) is not of this form.

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_prime_pow_succ_modEq (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime) (s : ℕ)
    (hs : 0 < s) (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau ((p ^ s : ℕ) : ℤ) (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ t ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
          if n = p ^ s * pentagonal t then (t.negOnePow : ℤ) else 0 [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 15.
Uses 1

TheoremGeneralized tau function \(\tau_{2p}\) modulo \(p\)#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be an odd prime, let \(\tau_k\) be the generalized tau function, and for an integer \(r\) let \(P(r) = r(3r - 1)/2\) be the generalized pentagonal number. For every integer \(n \ge 0\),

\[\tau_{2p}(n + 1) \equiv \sum (-1)^{r + s} \pmod p,\]

the sum running over the pairs of integers \(r, s\) with \(|r| \le n\), \(|s| \le n\) and \(n = p\,(P(r) + P(s))\).

The paper prints the side condition as \(n + 1 = p(P(r) + P(s))\), which is false: at \(n = 0\) the left side is \(\tau_{2p}(1) = 1\) while that sum is empty. The identity \(\sum_{n \ge 0} \tau_{2p}(n + 1) q^n \equiv \prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^{pm})^2 \pmod p\) from the paper's proof gives \(n = p(P(r) + P(s))\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_two_mul_prime_succ_modEq (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime) (hodd : Odd p)
    (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau (2 * p) (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ s ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if n = p * (pentagonal r + pentagonal s) then ((r + s).negOnePow : ℤ) else 0
      [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 16.
Uses 1

Theorem\(\tau_{2p}(n + 1)\) vanishes modulo \(p\) when \(p \nmid n\)#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be an odd prime and \(n\) a natural number not divisible by \(p\). Then \(\tau_{2p}(n + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod{p}\).

The record prints the hypothesis as \(p \nmid n + 1\); that is false, and the corollary follows from Theorem 3.26 (the record's Theorem 16) in its corrected form, which forces \(p \mid n\) for a nonzero residue.

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_two_mul_prime_succ_modEq_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime)
    (hodd : Odd p) (n : ℕ) (hn : ¬ p ∣ n) :
    generalizedTau (2 * p) (n + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 4.
Uses 1

TheoremGeneralized tau at \(2p + 1\) modulo \(p\)#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be an odd prime and \(n\) a natural number, and for an integer \(j\) let \(P(j) = j(3j - 1)/2\) be the generalized pentagonal number. Then \(\tau_{2p + 1}(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(p\) to the sum of \((-1)^{r + s + t}\) over the triples of integers \((r, s, t)\) with \(-n \le r, s, t \le n\) and \(n = P(r) + p(P(s) + P(t))\).

The record prints the condition as \(n + 1 = P(r) + p(P(s) + P(t))\); that is false, and the proof's identity \(\sum \tau_{2p+1}(n + 1) q^n \equiv \prod (1 - q^m)(1 - q^{pm})^2 \pmod{p}\) gives the index \(n\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_two_mul_prime_add_one_succ_modEq (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime)
    (hodd : Odd p) (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau (2 * p + 1) (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ s ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ t ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if n = pentagonal r + p * (pentagonal s + pentagonal t) then
          ((r + s + t).negOnePow : ℤ)
        else 0 [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 17.
Uses 1

TheoremGeneralized tau at \(p^2 + 1\) modulo \(p\)#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be an odd prime and \(n\) a natural number, and for an integer \(j\) let \(P(j) = j(3j - 1)/2\) be the generalized pentagonal number. Then \(\tau_{p^2 + 1}(n + 1)\) is congruent modulo \(p\) to the sum of \((-1)^{r + s}\) over the pairs of integers \((r, s)\) with \(-n \le r, s \le n\) and \(n = P(r) + p^2 P(s)\).

The record prints the condition as \(n + 1 = P(r) + p^2 P(s)\); that is false, and the proof's identity \(\sum \tau_{p^2+1}(n + 1) q^n \equiv \prod (1 - q^m)(1 - q^{p^2 m}) \pmod{p}\) gives the index \(n\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_prime_sq_add_one_succ_modEq (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime)
    (hodd : Odd p) (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau (p ^ 2 + 1) (n + 1) ≡
      ∑ r ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n, ∑ s ∈ Finset.Icc (-(n : ℤ)) n,
        if n = pentagonal r + p ^ 2 * pentagonal s then ((r + s).negOnePow : ℤ) else 0
      [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 18.
Uses 1

TheoremA congruence for 9-regular partitions at \(4n + 1\)#●ready to prove

Let \(R_9(m)\) denote the number of partitions of \(m\) in which no part is divisible by \(9\). For every positive integer \(n\), \(R_9(4n + 1) \equiv R_9(n) \pmod 3\).

public theorem_wanted card_nine_regular_four_mul_add_one_modEq (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted (4 * n + 1) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
    ≡ ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 19.

TheoremIterated congruences for 9-regular partitions modulo 3#●ready to prove

Let \(R_9(m)\) denote the number of partitions of \(m\) in which no part is divisible by \(9\), and let \(N_s = (4^s - 1)/3\). For all positive integers \(r\) and \(s\), \(R_9((r - 1) 4^{s-1} + N_s) \equiv R_9(r) \pmod 3\), \(R_9(N_s) \equiv 1 \pmod 3\), \(R_9(4^{s-1} + N_s) \equiv 2 \pmod 3\) and \(R_9(2 \cdot 4^{s-1} + N_s) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\).

public theorem_wanted card_nine_regular_iterate_modEq (r s : ℕ) (hr : 0 < r) (hs : 0 < s) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted ((r - 1) * 4 ^ (s - 1) + (4 ^ s - 1) / 3) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
        ≡ ((Nat.Partition.restricted (r) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) [ZMOD 3] ∧
      ((Nat.Partition.restricted ((4 ^ s - 1) / 3) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) ≡ 1 [ZMOD 3] ∧
      ((Nat.Partition.restricted (4 ^ (s - 1) + (4 ^ s - 1) / 3) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ) ≡ 2 [ZMOD 3] ∧
      ((Nat.Partition.restricted (2 * 4 ^ (s - 1) + (4 ^ s - 1) / 3) (¬ 9 ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
          ≡ 0 [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 5.

TheoremPrime-regular partitions and the generalized tau function#●ready to prove

Let \(p\) be a prime and \(n\) a natural number. Let \(R_p(n)\) be the number of partitions of \(n\) in which no part is divisible by \(p\), and let \(\tau_k(m)\) be the generalized tau function, the coefficient of \(q^m\) in \(q \prod_{j \ge 1} (1 - q^j)^k\). Then \(R_p(n) \equiv \tau_{p-1}(n + 1) \pmod p\).

public theorem_wanted card_prime_regular_modEq_generalizedTau_pred (p : ℕ) (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) :
    ((Nat.Partition.restricted (n) (¬ p ∣ ·)).card : ℤ)
        ≡ generalizedTau ((p : ℤ) - 1) (n + 1) [ZMOD p]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 20.
Uses 1

TheoremBinomial coefficients \(\binom{n+k}{k}\) modulo an odd prime#●ready to prove

Let \(l\) be an odd prime, \(k\) an integer with \(1 \le k < l\), \(n\) a natural number, and \(r\) the remainder of \(n\) modulo \(l\). If \(r \le l - k - 1\), then \(\binom{n+k}{k} \equiv (-1)^r \binom{l-k-1}{r} \pmod l\); otherwise \(\binom{n+k}{k} \equiv 0 \pmod l\).

public theorem_wanted choose_add_modEq_prime (l : ℕ) (hl : l.Prime) (hodd : Odd l) (k : ℕ)
    (hk : 1 ≤ k) (hkl : k < l) (n : ℕ) :
    ((n + k).choose k : ℤ) ≡
      (if n % l ≤ l - k - 1 then (-1 : ℤ) ^ (n % l) * ((l - k - 1).choose (n % l) : ℤ)
        else 0) [ZMOD l]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Lemma 1.

Theorem\(\tau_{-k}\) and partition convolutions modulo a prime#●ready to prove

Let \(l\) be an odd prime, let \(k\) be a natural number with \(2 \le k < l\), let \(n\) be a natural number, and write \(p(s)\) for the number of partitions of \(s\). Then

\[\tau_{-k}(n + 1) \equiv \sum_{s=0}^{\lfloor n/l \rfloor} \tau_{l-k}(n - ls + 1)\, p(s) \pmod{l},\]

and the composition sum \(\sum p(a_1) p(a_2) \cdots p(a_k)\), taken over all \(k\)-tuples \((a_1, \dots, a_k)\) of natural numbers with \(a_1 + \cdots + a_k = n\), is congruent modulo \(l\) to the same right-hand side.

The record prints \(\tau_{l-k}(t)\) in place of \(\tau_{l-k}(t + 1)\), writing \(n = t + ls\); that is false. The proof's identity \(\prod (1 - q^m)^{-k} \equiv \prod (1 - q^m)^{l-k} (1 - q^{lm})^{-1} \pmod{l}\) together with Definition 1.1 (\(\prod (1 - q^m)^j = \sum \tau_j(t + 1) q^t\)) gives \(\tau_{l-k}(t + 1)\); Corollary 4.3 (the record's Corollary 6) uses this shifted form, \(\omega(t) = \tau_1(t + 1)\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_neg_succ_modEq_partition_convolution (k : ℕ) (hk : 2 ≤ k)
    (l : ℕ) (hl : l.Prime) (hodd : Odd l) (hkl : k < l) (n : ℕ) :
    generalizedTau (-(k : ℤ)) (n + 1) ≡
        ∑ s ∈ Finset.range (n / l + 1),
          generalizedTau ((l : ℤ) - k) (n - l * s + 1)
              * (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition s) : ℤ) [ZMOD l] ∧
      (∑ a ∈ Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple k n,
          ∏ i, (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition (a i)) : ℤ)) ≡
        ∑ s ∈ Finset.range (n / l + 1),
          generalizedTau ((l : ℤ) - k) (n - l * s + 1)
              * (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition s) : ℤ) [ZMOD l]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Theorem 21.
Uses 1

TheoremPartition convolution modulo \(3\)#●ready to prove

Let \(p(a)\) be the number of partitions of \(a\), and let \(\omega(t)\) be the coefficient of \(q^t\) in Euler's product \(\prod_{m \ge 1} (1 - q^m)\). For every integer \(n \ge 0\),

\[\sum_{a + b = n} p(a)\, p(b) \equiv \sum_{0 \le s \le n/3} \omega(n - 3s)\, p(s) \pmod 3,\]

the left sum running over pairs \((a, b)\) of nonnegative integers and the right one over integers \(s\).

public theorem_wanted partition_convolution_two_modEq_three (n : ℕ) :
    (∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n,
        (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition x.1) : ℤ) * (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition x.2) : ℤ)) ≡
      ∑ s ∈ Finset.range (n / 3 + 1),
        PowerSeries.coeff (n - 3 * s) (PowerSeries.pentagonalSeries ℤ)
            * (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition s) : ℤ) [ZMOD 3]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 6.

TheoremPartition composition sums vanishing modulo a prime#●ready to prove

Let \(p(a)\) be the number of partitions of \(a\). Let \(\ell \ge 5\) be a prime and \(m \ge 0\) an integer such that \(m \not\equiv 0 \pmod{\ell}\) and \(m \not\equiv (-1)^r \binom{\ell - 3}{r} \pmod{\ell}\) for every integer \(r\) with \(0 \le r \le (\ell - 3)/2\). Then every integer \(n \ge 0\) with \(n \equiv m \pmod{\ell}\) satisfies

\[\sum_{a_1 + \cdots + a_{\ell - 3} = n} p(a_1) \cdots p(a_{\ell - 3}) \equiv 0 \pmod{\ell},\]

the sum running over all \((\ell - 3)\)-tuples \((a_1, \dots, a_{\ell - 3})\) of nonnegative integers with sum \(n\).

public theorem_wanted partition_composition_sum_modEq_zero (l : ℕ) (hl : l.Prime) (h5 : 5 ≤ l)
    (m : ℕ) (hm0 : ¬ (m : ℤ) ≡ 0 [ZMOD l])
    (hm : ∀ r ≤ (l - 3) / 2, ¬ (m : ℤ) ≡ (-1 : ℤ) ^ r * ((l - 3).choose r : ℤ) [ZMOD l])
    (n : ℕ) (hn : n ≡ m [MOD l]) :
    (∑ a ∈ Finset.Nat.antidiagonalTuple (l - 3) n,
        ∏ i, (Fintype.card (Nat.Partition (a i)) : ℤ)) ≡ 0 [ZMOD l]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 7.

TheoremRamanujan's congruence modulo \(7\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau(n) = \tau_{24}(n)\) be Ramanujan's tau function, the generalized tau function with \(k = 24\). For every positive integer \(n\), \(\tau(7n) \equiv 0 \pmod 7\).

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_seven_mul_modEq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) :
    generalizedTau 24 (7 * n) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 7]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Corollary 8.
Uses 1

TheoremVanishing of \(\tau_k(n)\) modulo the prime \(k - 1\)#●ready to prove

Let \(n \ge 1\) and let \(k\) be a natural number such that \(k - 1\) is prime. For an integer \(t\) let \(P(t) = t(3t - 1)/2\) be the generalized pentagonal number. If \(k - 1\) does not divide \(n - 1 - P(t)\) for any integer \(t\) with \(P(t) \le n - 1\), then the generalized tau function satisfies \(\tau_k(n) \equiv 0 \pmod{k - 1}\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_modEq_zero_of_pentagonal (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (k : ℕ)
    (hk : (k - 1).Prime)
    (h : ∀ t : ℤ, pentagonal t ≤ n - 1 → ¬ (k - 1) ∣ n - 1 - pentagonal t) :
    generalizedTau k n ≡ 0 [ZMOD ((k - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ)]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Proposition 1.
Uses 1

TheoremDivisibility of \(n\,\tau_k(n + 1)\) by \(|k|\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau_k\) be the generalized tau function. For every positive integer \(n\) and every integer \(k\) with \(|k| \ge 2\), \(n\,\tau_k(n + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod{|k|}\).

public theorem_wanted mul_generalizedTau_succ_modEq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) (k : ℤ) (hk : 2 ≤ |k|)
    :
    (n : ℤ) * generalizedTau k (n + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD |k|]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Proposition 2.
Uses 1

TheoremVanishing of the generalized tau function modulo \(|k|/d\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau_k(n)\) be the generalized tau function, the coefficient of \(q^n\) in \(q \prod_{j \ge 1} (1 - q^j)^k\). Let \(k\) be an integer with \(|k| \ge 2\) and \(d\) a natural number dividing \(|k|\) with \(d < |k|\). Then for all natural numbers \(m\) and \(r\) with \(\gcd(r, |k|/d) = 1\), \(\tau_k(|k| m + d r + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod{|k|/d}\).

public theorem_wanted generalizedTau_modEq_zero_of_coprime (m : ℕ) (k : ℤ) (hk : 2 ≤ |k|) (d : ℕ)
    (hd : d ∣ k.natAbs) (hdk : d < k.natAbs) (r : ℕ)
    (hr : Nat.gcd r (k.natAbs / d) = 1) :
    generalizedTau k (k.natAbs * m + d * r + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD ((k.natAbs / d : ℕ) : ℤ)]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Proposition 3.
Uses 1

TheoremRamanujan's tau function modulo divisors of \(24\)#●ready to prove

Let \(\tau(n) = \tau_{24}(n)\) be Ramanujan's tau function, the generalized tau function with \(k = 24\). For every integer \(m \ge 0\): \(\tau(24m + r + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod{24}\) for \(r \in \{1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23\}\); \(\tau(24m + r + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod 6\) for \(r \in \{4, 20\}\); \(\tau(24m + r + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod 8\) for \(r \in \{3, 6, 9, 15\}\); \(\tau(24m + r + 1) \equiv 0 \pmod 3\) for \(r \in \{8, 16\}\); and \(\tau(24m + 13) \equiv 0 \pmod 2\).

The paper prints the moduli of the second, fourth and fifth congruences as \(12\), \(6\) and \(4\), which is false (for instance \(\tau(5) = 4830\) is not divisible by \(12\)); the moduli used are \(24/\gcd(r, 24)\), which the paper's Proposition 2.4 at \(k = 24\) gives. The first and third congruences are as printed.

public theorem_wanted ramanujanTau_modEq_divisors_twentyfour (m : ℕ) :
    (∀ r ∈ ({1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23} : Finset ℕ),
        generalizedTau 24 (24 * m + r + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 24]) ∧
      (∀ r ∈ ({4, 20} : Finset ℕ), generalizedTau 24 (24 * m + r + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 6]) ∧
      (∀ r ∈ ({3, 9, 6, 15} : Finset ℕ), generalizedTau 24 (24 * m + r + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 8]) ∧
      (∀ r ∈ ({8, 16} : Finset ℕ), generalizedTau 24 (24 * m + r + 1) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 3]) ∧
      generalizedTau 24 (24 * m + 13) ≡ 0 [ZMOD 2]
Sources
  • S. Sriram and A. David Christopher, Congruences Relating Regular Partition Functions, a Generalized Tau Function, and Partition Function Weighted Composition Sums, INTEGERS 24 (2024), Article A39, Proposition 4.
Uses 1
6 fully proved34 ready to prove

The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.

Download the complete graph data.