Brousseau sums of k-Fibonacci numbers

DefinitionThe numbers \(A_k^{(p)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums#✓fully proved

For a rational number \(k\), the rational numbers \(A_k^{(p)}\), \(p \ge 0\), are defined by \(A_k^{(0)} = 1\) and, for \(p \ge 1\),

\[ A_k^{(p)} = \frac{2}{k} \sum_{j=1}^{\lceil p/2 \rceil} \binom{p}{2j-1} A_k^{(p-2j+1)}, \]

where \(2/k\) is read as \(0\) when \(k = 0\).

def brousseauA (k : ℚ) : ℕ → ℚ
  | 0 => 1
  | p + 1 => 2 / k * ∑ j ∈ Finset.range ((p + 2) / 2),
      ((p + 1).choose (2 * j + 1) : ℚ) * brousseauA k (p - 2 * j)
decreasing_by omega
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 1.
Used by 7

TheoremThe initial value \(A_k^{(0)} = 1\)#✓fully proved

For every rational number \(k\), the number \(A_k^{(0)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums equals \(1\).

theorem brousseauA_zero (k : ℚ) : brousseauA k 0 = 1
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 1.
Uses 1 · Used by 3

TheoremThe value \(A_k^{(1)} = 2/k\)#✓fully proved

For every rational number \(k\), the number \(A_k^{(1)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums equals \(2/k\), where \(2/0\) is read as \(0\).

theorem brousseauA_one (k : ℚ) : brousseauA k 1 = 2 / k
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 1.
Uses 2 · Used by 2

TheoremThe value \(A_k^{(2)} = 8/k^2\)#✓fully proved

For every rational number \(k\), the number \(A_k^{(2)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums equals \(8/k^2\), where \(8/0\) is read as \(0\).

theorem brousseauA_two (k : ℚ) : brousseauA k 2 = 8 / k ^ 2
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 1.
Uses 2

DefinitionThe coefficient polynomials \(C_k^{(p)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums#✓fully proved

For a rational number \(k\), let \(A_k^{(r)}\) be the numbers for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums. For a natural number \(p\) and a rational number \(n\),

\[ C_k^{(p)}(n) = \sum_{r=0}^{p} (-1)^r A_k^{(r)} \binom{p}{r} n^{p-r}, \]

where \(0^0 = 1\); in particular \(C_k^{(p)}(0) = (-1)^p A_k^{(p)}\).

def brousseauCoeff (k : ℚ) (p : ℕ) (n : ℚ) : ℚ :=
  ∑ r ∈ Finset.range (p + 1), (-1) ^ r * brousseauA k r * (p.choose r : ℚ) * n ^ (p - r)
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 5.
Uses 1 · Used by 6

TheoremThe polynomial \(C_k^{(0)}\) is constant \(1\)#✓fully proved

For all rational numbers \(k\) and \(n\), the coefficient polynomial \(C_k^{(0)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums satisfies \(C_k^{(0)}(n) = 1\).

theorem brousseauCoeff_zero (k n : ℚ) : brousseauCoeff k 0 n = 1
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 5.
Uses 3

TheoremThe polynomial \(C_k^{(1)}(n) = n - 2/k\)#✓fully proved

For all rational numbers \(k\) and \(n\), the coefficient polynomial \(C_k^{(1)}\) for \(k\)-Fibonacci Brousseau sums satisfies \(C_k^{(1)}(n) = n - 2/k\), where \(2/0\) is read as \(0\).

theorem brousseauCoeff_one (k n : ℚ) : brousseauCoeff k 1 n = n - 2 / k
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Definition 5.
Uses 4

Theorem\(k\)-Fibonacci numbers as a power-weighted convolution#●ready to prove

For an integer \(k\), let \(F_{k,n}\) be the \(k\)-Fibonacci numbers, the Lucas sequence \(U(k, -1)\): \(F_{k,0} = 0\), \(F_{k,1} = 1\) and \(F_{k,n+2} = k F_{k,n+1} + F_{k,n}\). For every integer \(k\), every \(n \ge 0\) and every \(p \ge 1\),

\[ F_{k,n} = n^p + \sum_{i=1}^{n} \Bigl(k i^p - 2 \sum_{j=1}^{\lceil p/2 \rceil} \binom{p}{2j-1} i^{p-2j+1}\Bigr) F_{k,n-i}. \]

The paper assumes \(k \ge 1\) and \(n \ge 1\).

public theorem_wanted kFibonacci_eq_pow_add_convolution (k : ℤ) (n p : ℕ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) :
    lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ n = (n : ℤ) ^ p +
      ∑ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 n, (k * (i : ℤ) ^ p -
        2 * ∑ j ∈ Finset.Icc 1 ((p + 1) / 2),
          (p.choose (2 * j - 1) : ℤ) * (i : ℤ) ^ (p + 1 - 2 * j)) *
        lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (n - i)
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Theorem 1 (jis-2024-24.6.4-thm-1).
Uses 2

TheoremPower-weighted convolution of k-Fibonacci numbers#●ready to prove

Let \(k\) be a nonzero integer and let \(F_{k,n}\) be the \(k\)-Fibonacci numbers, the Lucas sequence \(U(k, -1)\): \(F_{k,0} = 0\), \(F_{k,1} = 1\) and \(F_{k,n+2} = k F_{k,n+1} + F_{k,n}\). Let \(A_k^{(0)} = 1\) and \(A_k^{(p)} = \frac{2}{k} \sum_{j=1}^{\lceil p/2 \rceil} \binom{p}{2j-1} A_k^{(p-2j+1)}\) for \(p \ge 1\). Then for all natural numbers \(n\) and \(p\), with \(0^0 = 1\),

\[ k \sum_{i=0}^{n} i^p F_{k,n-i} = A_k^{(p)} F_{k,n+1} + \sum_{r=0}^{p} A_k^{(r)} \binom{p}{r} \left((-1)^{p-r} F_{k,n} - n^{p-r}\right). \]

The source takes \(k\) to be a positive integer.

public theorem_wanted kFibonacci_power_convolution (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) (n p : ℕ) :
    (k : ℚ) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (i : ℚ) ^ p * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (n - i) =
      brousseauA k p * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (n + 1) +
        ∑ r ∈ Finset.range (p + 1), brousseauA k r * (p.choose r : ℚ) *
          ((-1) ^ (p - r) * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ n - (n : ℚ) ^ (p - r))
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Theorem 4 (jis-2024-24.6.4-thm-4).
Uses 3

TheoremBrousseau sums of \(k\)-Fibonacci numbers#●ready to prove

For an integer \(k\), let \(F_{k,n}\) be the \(k\)-Fibonacci numbers, the Lucas sequence \(U(k, -1)\) (\(F_{k,0} = 0\), \(F_{k,1} = 1\), \(F_{k,n+2} = k F_{k,n+1} + F_{k,n}\)), and let \(C_k^{(p)}\) be the coefficient polynomials. For every nonzero integer \(k\) and all \(n, p \ge 0\),

\[ k \sum_{i=0}^{n} i^p F_{k,i} = C_k^{(p)}(n) F_{k,n+1} + C_k^{(p)}(n+1) F_{k,n} - C_k^{(p)}(0), \]

where \(0^0 = 1\).

The paper assumes \(k \ge 1\).

public theorem_wanted kFibonacci_brousseau_sum (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) (n p : ℕ) :
    (k : ℚ) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (i : ℚ) ^ p * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ i =
      brousseauCoeff k p n * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (n + 1) +
        brousseauCoeff k p (n + 1) * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ n - brousseauCoeff k p 0
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Theorem 6 (jis-2024-24.6.4-thm-6).
Uses 3

TheoremBrousseau sums of Fibonacci numbers along an odd step#●ready to prove

Let \(F_n\) be the Fibonacci numbers, \(L_n\) the Lucas numbers and \(C_k^{(p)}\) the coefficient polynomials. For every odd natural number \(m\) and all \(n, p \ge 0\),

\[ L_m \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^p F_{mi} = C_{L_m}^{(p)}(n) F_{m(n+1)} + C_{L_m}^{(p)}(n+1) F_{mn} - C_{L_m}^{(p)}(0) F_m. \]
public theorem_wanted fibonacci_brousseau_sum_mul_odd (m : ℕ) (hm : Odd m) (n p : ℕ) :
    (lucasNumber m : ℚ) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 n, (i : ℚ) ^ p * Nat.fib (m * i) =
      brousseauCoeff (lucasNumber m) p n * Nat.fib (m * (n + 1)) +
        brousseauCoeff (lucasNumber m) p (n + 1) * Nat.fib (m * n) -
        brousseauCoeff (lucasNumber m) p 0 * Nat.fib m
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Corollary 9 (jis-2024-24.6.4-cor-9).
Uses 2

TheoremPower-weighted Pell sums along odd multiples#●ready to prove

Let \(P_n\) be the Pell numbers and \(Q_n\) the Pell–Lucas numbers, the Lucas sequence \(V(2, -1)\): \(Q_0 = Q_1 = 2\) and \(Q_{n+2} = 2 Q_{n+1} + Q_n\). Let \(m\) be an odd natural number and write \(k = Q_m\). Let \(A_k^{(0)} = 1\) and \(A_k^{(p)} = \frac{2}{k} \sum_{j=1}^{\lceil p/2 \rceil} \binom{p}{2j-1} A_k^{(p-2j+1)}\) for \(p \ge 1\), and let \(C_k^{(p)}(x) = \sum_{r=0}^{p} (-1)^r A_k^{(r)} \binom{p}{r} x^{p-r}\), with \(0^0 = 1\). Then for all natural numbers \(n\) and \(p\),

\[ Q_m \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^p P_{mi} = C_k^{(p)}(n) P_{m(n+1)} + C_k^{(p)}(n+1) P_{mn} - C_k^{(p)}(0) P_m. \]
public theorem_wanted pell_brousseau_sum_mul_odd (m : ℕ) (hm : Odd m) (n p : ℕ) :
    (lucasV ⟨2, -1, by decide⟩ m : ℚ) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 n, (i : ℚ) ^ p * pellNumber (m * i) =
      brousseauCoeff (lucasV ⟨2, -1, by decide⟩ m) p n * pellNumber (m * (n + 1)) +
        brousseauCoeff (lucasV ⟨2, -1, by decide⟩ m) p (n + 1) * pellNumber (m * n) -
        brousseauCoeff (lucasV ⟨2, -1, by decide⟩ m) p 0 * pellNumber m
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Corollary 10 (jis-2024-24.6.4-cor-10).
Uses 4

TheoremShifted power-weighted sums of k-Fibonacci numbers#●ready to prove

Let \(k\) be a nonzero integer and let \(F_{k,n}\) be the \(k\)-Fibonacci numbers, the Lucas sequence \(U(k, -1)\): \(F_{k,0} = 0\), \(F_{k,1} = 1\) and \(F_{k,n+2} = k F_{k,n+1} + F_{k,n}\). Let \(A_k^{(0)} = 1\) and \(A_k^{(p)} = \frac{2}{k} \sum_{j=1}^{\lceil p/2 \rceil} \binom{p}{2j-1} A_k^{(p-2j+1)}\) for \(p \ge 1\), and let \(C_k^{(p)}(x) = \sum_{r=0}^{p} (-1)^r A_k^{(r)} \binom{p}{r} x^{p-r}\), with \(0^0 = 1\). Then for all natural numbers \(m\), \(n\) and \(p\),

\[ k \sum_{i=1}^{n} i^p F_{k,m+i} = C_k^{(p)}(n) F_{k,m+n+1} + C_k^{(p)}(n+1) F_{k,m+n} - C_k^{(p)}(0) F_{k,m+1} - C_k^{(p)}(1) F_{k,m}. \]

The source takes \(k\) to be a positive integer.

public theorem_wanted kFibonacci_shifted_brousseau_sum (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) (m n p : ℕ) :
    (k : ℚ) * ∑ i ∈ Finset.Icc 1 n, (i : ℚ) ^ p * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (m + i) =
      brousseauCoeff k p n * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (m + n + 1) +
        brousseauCoeff k p (n + 1) * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (m + n) -
        brousseauCoeff k p 0 * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ (m + 1) -
        brousseauCoeff k p 1 * lucasU ⟨k, -1, by decide⟩ m
Sources
  • Prabha Sivaraman Nair and Rejikumar Karunakaran, On k-Fibonacci Brousseau Sums, Journal of Integer Sequences 27 (2024), Article 24.6.4, Theorem 11 (jis-2024-24.6.4-thm-11).
Uses 3
7 fully proved6 ready to prove

The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.

Download the complete graph data.