Powerful numbers in arithmetic progressions
TheoremArithmetic progressions of 2-full numbers of every length#✓fully proved
For every natural number \(k\) there are positive integers \(a\) and \(d\) such that \(a + id\) is \(2\)-full (powerful) for every natural number \(i < k\).
theorem arbitrarily_long_arithmetic_progressions_of_powerful_numbers_general (k : ℕ) :
∃ a d : ℕ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < d ∧
∀ i : ℕ, i < k → Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + i * d)
public def IsKFull (k n : ℕ) : Prop :=
n ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → p ^ k ∣ n
MathlibExt/NumberTheory/KFull.lean:40
Uses 1 · Used by 1
TheoremArbitrarily long arithmetic progressions of powerful numbers#✓fully proved
For every integer \(k \ge 3\) there are positive integers \(a\) and \(d\) such that each of the \(k\) numbers \(a + id\) with \(0 \le i < k\) is powerful: every prime that divides \(a + id\) has its square dividing \(a + id\).
theorem arbitrarily_long_arithmetic_progressions_of_powerful_numbers
(k : ℕ) (hk : 3 ≤ k) :
∃ a d : ℕ, 0 < a ∧ 0 < d ∧
∀ i : ℕ, i < k →
∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ a + i * d → p ^ 2 ∣ a + i * d
Sources
- Tsz Ho Chan, "Arithmetic Progressions Among Powerful Numbers", Journal of Integer Sequences 26 (2023), Article 23.1.1, Theorem
thm-longAP, source lines 97–99, https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/journals/JIS/VOL26/Chan/chan33.tex. The paper notes the result is not new (see remark 2 in [H] there) and includes a proof for completeness. Powerful (squarefull) means every prime divisor appears with exponent at least two; nonconstant is0 < d. It follows fromarbitrarily_long_arithmetic_progressions_of_powerful_numbers_general, which states powerfulness asNat.IsKFull 2; the hypothesishkis unused and keeps the source's shape.
Uses 2
DefinitionFour-term progressions of pairwise coprime powerful numbers#✓fully proved
For natural numbers \(a\) and \(d\), the numbers \(a\), \(a + d\), \(a + 2d\), \(a + 3d\) form a four-term arithmetic progression of pairwise coprime powerful numbers when \(d > 0\), each of the four numbers is powerful (that is, \(2\)-full: nonzero and divisible by \(p^2\) for every prime \(p\) dividing it), and any two of the four numbers are coprime.
def IsCoprimePowerfulAP4 (a d : ℕ) : Prop :=
0 < d ∧
Nat.IsKFull 2 a ∧ Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + d) ∧ Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + 2 * d) ∧
Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + 3 * d) ∧
a.Coprime (a + d) ∧ a.Coprime (a + 2 * d) ∧ a.Coprime (a + 3 * d) ∧
(a + d).Coprime (a + 2 * d) ∧ (a + d).Coprime (a + 3 * d) ∧
(a + 2 * d).Coprime (a + 3 * d)
public def IsKFull (k n : ℕ) : Prop :=
n ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → p ∣ n → p ^ k ∣ n
MathlibExt/NumberTheory/KFull.lean:40
Uses 1 · Used by 1
DefinitionStatement of Erdős Problem 937#✓fully proved
There are infinitely many pairs of natural numbers \((a, d)\) with \(d > 0\) such that the four numbers \(a\), \(a + d\), \(a + 2d\), \(a + 3d\) are powerful (each is nonzero and divisible by \(p^2\) for every prime \(p\) dividing it) and pairwise coprime; that is, infinitely many four-term arithmetic progressions of pairwise coprime powerful numbers.
def conjecture : Prop :=
{p : ℕ × ℕ | IsCoprimePowerfulAP4 p.1 p.2}.Infinite
def IsCoprimePowerfulAP4 (a d : ℕ) : Prop :=
0 < d ∧
Nat.IsKFull 2 a ∧ Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + d) ∧ Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + 2 * d) ∧
Nat.IsKFull 2 (a + 3 * d) ∧
a.Coprime (a + d) ∧ a.Coprime (a + 2 * d) ∧ a.Coprime (a + 3 * d) ∧
(a + d).Coprime (a + 2 * d) ∧ (a + d).Coprime (a + 3 * d) ∧
(a + 2 * d).Coprime (a + 3 * d)
WantedExt/NumberTheory/ErdosProblem937Wanted.lean:34
Uses 1 · Used by 1
TheoremErdős Problem 937 holds (Bajpai–Bennett–Chan)#●ready to prove
There are infinitely many pairs of natural numbers \((a, d)\) with \(d > 0\) such that the four numbers \(a\), \(a + d\), \(a + 2d\), \(a + 3d\) are powerful (each is nonzero and divisible by \(p^2\) for every prime \(p\) dividing it) and pairwise coprime. That is, there are infinitely many four-term arithmetic progressions of pairwise coprime powerful numbers.
public theorem_wanted conjecture_holds : conjecture
def conjecture : Prop :=
{p : ℕ × ℕ | IsCoprimePowerfulAP4 p.1 p.2}.Infinite
WantedExt/NumberTheory/ErdosProblem937Wanted.lean:44
Sources
- Prajeet Bajpai, Michael A. Bennett, and Tsz Ho Chan, Arithmetic progressions in squarefull numbers, International Journal of Number Theory 20 (2024), 19–45, https://mathscinet.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=4688726. Resolved true: Resolved true by Bajpai–Bennett–Chan; a proof is available in an external Lean development.
Uses 1
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.