Sperner property of the weak order
DefinitionInversion set of a permutation#✓fully proved
For a permutation \(\sigma\) of \(\{0, \dots, n-1\}\), the inversion set of \(\sigma\) is the set of pairs of positions \((i, j)\) with \(i < j\) and \(\sigma(j) < \sigma(i)\).
def inversions {n : ℕ} (σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) : Finset (Fin n × Fin n) :=
Finset.univ.filter fun p => p.1 < p.2 ∧ σ p.2 < σ p.1
Used by 2
DefinitionWeak order on the symmetric group#✓fully proved
For permutations \(\sigma\) and \(\tau\) of \(\{0, \dots, n-1\}\), \(\sigma \le \tau\) in the weak order when the inversion set of \(\sigma\) (its pairs of positions \((i, j)\) with \(i < j\) and \(\sigma(j) < \sigma(i)\)) is contained in the inversion set of \(\tau\).
def weakLE {n : ℕ} (σ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) : Prop :=
inversions σ ⊆ inversions τ
def inversions {n : ℕ} (σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) : Finset (Fin n × Fin n) :=
Finset.univ.filter fun p => p.1 < p.2 ∧ σ p.2 < σ p.1
WantedExt/Combinatorics/WeakOrderSpernerAMR30Problem0039Wanted.lean:39
Uses 1 · Used by 1
DefinitionSperner property of the weak order#✓fully proved
This is the statement that for every \(n\) and every antichain \(A\) of the weak order on the permutations of \(\{0, \dots, n-1\}\) (where \(\sigma \le \tau\) when the inversion set of \(\sigma\) is contained in that of \(\tau\)), there is a \(k\) such that \(A\) has at most as many elements as there are permutations with exactly \(k\) inversions. Equivalently, no antichain is larger than the largest rank level, the rank of a permutation being its number of inversions.
def weakOrderSperner : Prop :=
∀ (n : ℕ) (A : Finset (Equiv.Perm (Fin n))), IsAntichain weakLE (A : Set (Equiv.Perm (Fin n))) →
∃ k : ℕ, A.card ≤
(Finset.univ.filter fun σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) => (inversions σ).card = k).card
def weakLE {n : ℕ} (σ τ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) : Prop :=
inversions σ ⊆ inversions τ
WantedExt/Combinatorics/WeakOrderSpernerAMR30Problem0039Wanted.lean:44
def inversions {n : ℕ} (σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) : Finset (Fin n × Fin n) :=
Finset.univ.filter fun p => p.1 < p.2 ∧ σ p.2 < σ p.1
WantedExt/Combinatorics/WeakOrderSpernerAMR30Problem0039Wanted.lean:39
Uses 2 · Used by 1
TheoremThe weak order on the symmetric group is Sperner#●ready to prove
For every \(n\) and every antichain \(A\) of the weak order on the symmetric group \(S_n\) of permutations of \(\{0, \dots, n-1\}\) (where \(\sigma \le \tau\) when the inversion set of \(\sigma\) is contained in that of \(\tau\)), there is a \(k\) such that \(A\) has at most as many elements as there are permutations with exactly \(k\) inversions.
Resolved true: Gaetz and Gao prove Stanley's conjecture that the weak order on \(S_n\) is strongly Sperner (a Peck poset); in particular it is Sperner.
public theorem_wanted weakOrderSperner_holds : weakOrderSperner
def weakOrderSperner : Prop :=
∀ (n : ℕ) (A : Finset (Equiv.Perm (Fin n))), IsAntichain weakLE (A : Set (Equiv.Perm (Fin n))) →
∃ k : ℕ, A.card ≤
(Finset.univ.filter fun σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) => (inversions σ).card = k).card
WantedExt/Combinatorics/WeakOrderSpernerAMR30Problem0039Wanted.lean:49
Sources
- J. Cooper, Combinatorial Problems I Like (2020 snapshot), Matroids, Lattices, and Posets, item 39, https://people.math.sc.edu/cooper/combprob.html; resolution: C. Gaetz and Y. Gao, A combinatorial sl₂-action and the Sperner property for the weak order, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 148 (2020); arXiv:1811.05501, abstract: the sl₂-representation resolves Stanley's conjecture that the weak order has the strong Sperner property (and is a Peck poset); strongly Sperner implies Sperner, https://doi.org/10.1090/proc/14655.
Uses 1
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.