Shifted sumsets in sets of positive density
DefinitionErdős Problem 656 (shifted restricted sumsets in dense sets)#✓fully proved
The statement that for every set \(A\) of natural numbers with positive upper density, that is, with \(\limsup_{N \to \infty} |A \cap \{0, \dots, N - 1\}| / N > 0\), there are an infinite set \(B \subseteq A\) and an integer \(t\) such that \(b_1 + b_2 + t \in A\) for all distinct \(b_1, b_2 \in B\).
def restrictedSumsetShiftInDenseSet : Prop :=
∀ A : Set ℕ, 0 < A.upperDensity →
∃ B ⊆ A, B.Infinite ∧ ∃ t : ℤ, ∀ b₁ ∈ B, ∀ b₂ ∈ B, b₁ ≠ b₂ →
∃ a ∈ A, (a : ℤ) = b₁ + b₂ + t
Uses 1 · Used by 1
TheoremErdős Problem 656 is true#●ready to prove
For every set \(A\) of natural numbers with positive upper density, that is, with \(\limsup_{N \to \infty} |A \cap \{0, \dots, N - 1\}| / N > 0\), there are an infinite set \(B \subseteq A\) and an integer \(t\) such that \(b_1 + b_2 + t \in A\) for all distinct \(b_1, b_2 \in B\).
This is the theorem of Kra, Moreira, Richter and Robertson.
public theorem_wanted restrictedSumsetShiftInDenseSet_holds : restrictedSumsetShiftInDenseSet
def restrictedSumsetShiftInDenseSet : Prop :=
∀ A : Set ℕ, 0 < A.upperDensity →
∃ B ⊆ A, B.Infinite ∧ ∃ t : ℤ, ∀ b₁ ∈ B, ∀ b₂ ∈ B, b₁ ≠ b₂ →
∃ a ∈ A, (a : ℤ) = b₁ + b₂ + t
WantedExt/Combinatorics/DensityRestrictedSumsetShiftErdosProblem656Wanted.lean:36
Sources
- T. F. Bloom, Erdős Problems, Problem #656, https://www.erdosproblems.com/656 (status PROVED); resolution: B. Kra, J. Moreira, F. K. Richter and D. Robertson, A proof of Erdős's B + B + t conjecture, Commun. Am. Math. Soc. (2024), 480-494, arXiv:2206.12377, abstract: every set A of natural numbers with positive upper density can be shifted to contain the restricted sumset {b₁ + b₂ : b₁, b₂ ∈ B, b₁ ≠ b₂} for some infinite set B ⊂ A, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.12377.
Uses 1
Loading dependency explorer…
The dependency explorer needs JavaScript and its graph data.